From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel)
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, balancing & cleanup
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 00:13:13 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E153Qld-0007Df-00@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105251919480.10469-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> from "Rik van Riel" at May 25, 2001 07:20:20 PM
> On Fri, 25 May 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, shoot me. Here it is again, this time _with_ patch...
> >
> > I'm not going to apply this as long as it plays experimental games with
> > "shrink_icache()" and friends. I haven't seen anybody comment on the
> > performance on this,
>
> Yeah, I guess the way Linux 2.2 balances things is way too
> experimental ;)
Compared to the 2.0 performance - yes. 2.0 is faster than 2.2 is twice the
speed of 2.4 starting X and the session apps on my MediaGX box with 64Mb
But Linus is right I think - VM changes often prove 'interesting'. Test it in
-ac , gets some figures for real world use then plan further
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-25 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-25 20:00 Rik van Riel
2001-05-25 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-25 22:20 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-25 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-25 23:13 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2001-05-25 23:19 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 0:07 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 0:26 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 0:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 0:29 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 0:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 0:38 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 1:28 ` Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 1:35 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 1:39 ` Linux-2.4.5 Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 1:59 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 2:11 ` Linux-2.4.5 Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 2:38 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 2:49 ` Linux-2.4.5 Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 3:11 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 4:22 ` Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 4:31 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 8:10 ` Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 9:01 ` Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 9:18 ` Linux-2.4.5 arjan
2001-05-26 14:18 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 14:21 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 14:38 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 14:40 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 15:17 ` Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 15:28 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 15:59 ` Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 22:12 ` Linux-2.4.5 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-27 6:53 ` Linux-2.4.5 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-03 23:32 ` Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds
2001-06-05 2:21 ` Linux-2.4.5 Marcelo Tosatti
2001-05-26 15:09 ` Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds
2001-05-26 15:18 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 15:24 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 15:26 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 15:40 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 4:45 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 4:47 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 6:07 ` Linux-2.4.5 Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 14:32 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 14:36 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 15:03 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 15:08 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 15:20 ` Linux-2.4.5 Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 15:41 ` Linux-2.4.5 Rik van Riel
2001-05-26 0:42 ` [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, balancing & cleanup Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 0:52 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 1:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 1:38 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 1:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 2:01 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 2:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-05-26 2:40 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-26 1:43 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-25 22:35 ` Rik van Riel
2001-05-25 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E153Qld-0007Df-00@the-village.bc.nu \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®