From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:35:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:35:08 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:30989 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:34:58 -0400 Subject: Re: Problems with ac12 kernels and up To: jcwren@jcwren.com Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 19:32:09 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "John Chris Wren" at May 27, 2001 02:24:03 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > http://jcwren.com/linux/ac18.txt - ac18 dmesg dump > http://jcwren.com/linux/build.txt - sequence I'm using to build > > The apparent interleaved garbage closer to the bottom is exactly what came > out on the console. (Is linking to the dumps perferred over including it in > the mail, or would folks prefer to have the text included? Since I'm not a The link is fine.. > I also rebuilt the ac12 kernel, and tried again. Same results as the quoted > text above. This looks a lot like the superblock changes not only broke reiserfs but also initd usage. Al ?