From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 05:14:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 05:13:48 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:34824 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 05:13:40 -0400 Subject: Re: Plain 2.4.5 VM... To: jakob@unthought.net (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jakob_=D8stergaard?=) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:10:41 +0100 (BST) Cc: ghsong@kjist.ac.kr (G. Hugh Song), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010529061039.D29962@unthought.net> from "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jakob_=D8stergaard?=" at May 29, 2001 06:10:39 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's not a bug. It's a feature. It only breaks systems that are run w= > ith "too > little" swap, and the only difference from 2.2 till now is, that the de= > finition > of "too little" changed. its a giant bug. Or do you want to add 128Gb of unused swap to a full kitted out Xeon box - or 512Gb to a big athlon ???