From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 12:59:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 12:59:01 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:37899 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 12:58:54 -0400 Subject: Re: Problem with minor devices numbers in 2.4.4/68k To: baumann@optivus.com Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:56:26 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <000201c0e853$a4f4a540$bbc8c58f@mycroftpc.llumc.edu> from "Michael Baumann" at May 29, 2001 08:25:49 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > MINOR(inode->i_rdev) to decode that information. Now under > 2.4.4, this *appears* to be broken - though I am certain it Nope . Its right > But MINOR(inode->i_rdev) always returns 0, no matter which > minor devices I open. > If this doesn't belong here, please direct mail me, as this > has my stymied. The code looks right, check your config matches between the kernel and your modules, _especially_ if you are not using modversions