From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 18:45:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 18:45:30 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:18193 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 18:45:17 -0400 Subject: Re: Date goes four times faster! To: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de (Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?=) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 23:43:27 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel List) In-Reply-To: from "Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?=" at Jun 03, 2001 12:51:49 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I use your -ac series ever (did I? :-) but I am under the impression that my > hardware clock (date in the long run) is running (little) to fast. Well that would probably imply the clock is out on the machine - which with modern systems is not that unusual. You can tune the clock slide with adjtimex > > Athlon I 550 (0.25 µm) > MSI MS-6167 (AMD Irongate C4) --- Yes, Alan the very first one...;-) 00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-751 [Irongate] System Controller (rev 23) and my clock does behave.. > ACPI anabled... Brave man 8) Alan