From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 11:11:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 11:11:37 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:5 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 10:57:30 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac7 To: green@linuxhacker.ru (Oleg Drokin) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 15:54:59 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King), laughing@shared-source.org (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010603185142.A1474@linuxhacker.ru> from "Oleg Drokin" at Jun 03, 2001 06:51:42 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Last time I looked, it was supported: > > > + * usb-ohci-sa1111.h > > So the SA1110 has PCI bus ? Or at least equivalent logic ? > SA1110 do not have PCI bus. Neither do SA1111. Well since its not part of the standard or -ac kernel tree I can't evaluate other solutions. I think the ARM folks can deal with the question when they reach it > I am not sure what kind of equivalent logic you mean. > All IO addresses are fixed and specified in chip spec. OHCI is specified for PCI. It is specified in terms of PCI config registers in part. It could be that the code needs to have $CONFIG_PCI on the dep rules for OHCI and UHCI and the ARM driver be seperate. When the ARM stuff is merged its worth working out.