From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:02:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:02:30 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:54279 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 18:02:16 -0400 Subject: Re: Allocating non-contigious memory To: rhw@MemAlpha.CX (Riley Williams) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 23:01:26 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel) In-Reply-To: from "Riley Williams" at Jun 27, 2001 10:31:22 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Would it be useful to turn that particular code into a subroutine that > is called from each driver, or would that cause other problems? It would but then I suspect Linus wouldnt want to take it as it might encourage people to use it 8)