mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: tinglett@vnet.ibm.com (Todd Inglett)
Cc: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller),
	tgall%rchland.vnet@RCHGATE.RCHLAND.IBM.COM,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Changes for PCI
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:01:27 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E15FfAV-0007GV-00@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B3B5FCE.EF80E5E9@vnet.ibm.com> from "Todd Inglett" at Jun 28, 2001 11:48:14 AM

> beyond 256 physical busses in 2.4?  Maybe not.  But it is a simple
> change and it does work and it works around the existing drivers which
> compare busid+devfn for uniqueness when they really should compare
> pci_dev pointers.  Should it be redone the correct way (domains) in

I think it might be better to fix the needed drivers. I suspect ppc64 isnt
going to need that man drivers handle with initially

> The patch does not handle the user mode case.  This leaves the X server
> broken.  We could probably weed out busses beyond 256 under
> /proc/bus/pci as a workaround -- meaning the video adapter (if any --
> rare in these boxes) must be in one of the first I/O drawers.

Or scan the busses for video cards and number those busses 0,1,2... then
number the rest. Ugly but probably best for 2.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-06-28 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.993682861.9307.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-06-27 22:06 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-27 22:15   ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-27 22:57     ` Tom Gall
2001-06-27 23:34       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-27 18:24         ` Tom Gall
2001-06-28 20:57         ` Gérard Roudier
2001-06-28 21:11           ` Tom Gall
2001-06-28 21:18             ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-28 21:12           ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-27 23:17     ` anton
2001-06-27 23:41     ` Pete Zaitcev
2001-06-28  1:02     ` David S. Miller
2001-06-27 19:07       ` Tom Gall
2001-06-29  5:22         ` Richard Henderson
2001-06-29  3:14           ` Tom Gall
2001-06-28  1:04     ` David S. Miller
2001-06-27 18:49       ` Tom Gall
2001-06-28  4:06       ` David S. Miller
2001-06-27 20:01         ` Tom Gall
2001-06-27 23:12   ` anton
2001-06-28  0:59   ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 16:48     ` Todd Inglett
2001-06-28 17:01       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-28 17:20         ` Todd Inglett
2001-06-28 17:01       ` Alan Cox [this message]
2001-06-28 21:54         ` Gérard Roudier
2001-06-28  1:00   ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28  0:48 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 23:08 Khachaturov, Vassilii
2001-06-28 23:27 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E15FfAV-0007GV-00@the-village.bc.nu \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgall%rchland.vnet@RCHGATE.RCHLAND.IBM.COM \
    --cc=tinglett@vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®