From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: tinglett@vnet.ibm.com (Todd Inglett)
Cc: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller),
tgall%rchland.vnet@RCHGATE.RCHLAND.IBM.COM,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Changes for PCI
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:01:27 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E15FfAV-0007GV-00@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B3B5FCE.EF80E5E9@vnet.ibm.com> from "Todd Inglett" at Jun 28, 2001 11:48:14 AM
> beyond 256 physical busses in 2.4? Maybe not. But it is a simple
> change and it does work and it works around the existing drivers which
> compare busid+devfn for uniqueness when they really should compare
> pci_dev pointers. Should it be redone the correct way (domains) in
I think it might be better to fix the needed drivers. I suspect ppc64 isnt
going to need that man drivers handle with initially
> The patch does not handle the user mode case. This leaves the X server
> broken. We could probably weed out busses beyond 256 under
> /proc/bus/pci as a workaround -- meaning the video adapter (if any --
> rare in these boxes) must be in one of the first I/O drawers.
Or scan the busses for video cards and number those busses 0,1,2... then
number the rest. Ugly but probably best for 2.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-28 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.993682861.9307.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-06-27 22:06 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-27 22:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-27 22:57 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-27 23:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-27 18:24 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-28 20:57 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-06-28 21:11 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-28 21:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-28 21:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-27 23:17 ` anton
2001-06-27 23:41 ` Pete Zaitcev
2001-06-28 1:02 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-27 19:07 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-29 5:22 ` Richard Henderson
2001-06-29 3:14 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-28 1:04 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-27 18:49 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-28 4:06 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-27 20:01 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-27 23:12 ` anton
2001-06-28 0:59 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 16:48 ` Todd Inglett
2001-06-28 17:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-28 17:20 ` Todd Inglett
2001-06-28 17:01 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2001-06-28 21:54 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-06-28 1:00 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 0:48 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-28 23:08 Khachaturov, Vassilii
2001-06-28 23:27 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E15FfAV-0007GV-00@the-village.bc.nu \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgall%rchland.vnet@RCHGATE.RCHLAND.IBM.COM \
--cc=tinglett@vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®