From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:57:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:56:53 -0400 Received: from mx6.port.ru ([194.67.57.16]:8459 "EHLO mx6.port.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:56:37 -0400 From: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [195.34.27.173] Reply-To: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:56:52 +0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Because with the exception of your unique situation in which you have > a machine which is stable enough to compile a kernel on and develop > but can't run python, it's not a problem. Tom, i think Jes wanted to tell that basically there _are_ the cases when python hurts, so losing the freedom not to install python is not good. And you told him that his case is not looking good, so Jes miss the whole point. Bad logical chain. --- cheers, Samium Gromoff