From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:42:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:42:44 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:43274 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:42:29 -0400 Subject: Re: Bug still on 2.4.10? To: mblack@csihq.com (Mike Black) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:47:06 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel) In-Reply-To: <00d301c13b79$56982e20$e1de11cc@csihq.com> from "Mike Black" at Sep 12, 2001 06:54:46 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > This is on 2.4.8 but I get the funny feeling this maybe hasn't been fixed > yet for 2.4.10: > > Sep 11 06:58:08 yeti kernel: md: fsck.ext3(pid 151) used obsolete MD > ioctl(4717), upgrade your software to use new ictls. This isnt a kernel bug. > I'm runing: > Parallelizing fsck version 1.23 (15-Aug-2001) > Unless maybe I just need to recompile it??? Back down to 1.22