From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Oct 2001 06:12:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Oct 2001 06:11:57 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:40452 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 7 Oct 2001 06:11:48 -0400 Subject: Re: eepro100 net drivers To: acc@acc.hn.org (acc) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 11:17:33 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011007120208.5a426ef2.acc@acc.hn.org> from "acc" at Oct 07, 2001 12:02:08 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I have noticed that I only have this problem when my X is > running. When my X is shutdown I dont have any problems. > I downloaded and tested the latest stable kernel 2.4.10, but > it still dont work. > > I havn't found any solution for this problem, does anyone > known what the problem is ? Intel no doubt have a lovely list of errata but they aren't sharing them. The -ac tree eepro100.c does have a couple of fixes I've now sent on to Linus to do with needed delays and a workaround for a problem with one chip variant when running 10Mbit half duplex. That driver might help. If you want to test it you only need to apply the drivers/net/eepro100* part of the -ac patch just for that. Alan