mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian Bornträger" <linux-kernel@borntraeger.net>
To: "François Cami" <stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr>, "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@yahoo.com>
Cc: joeja@mindspring.com, John Alvord <jalvo@mbay.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing Kernel Releases Before Being Released (Was Re: Re: loop back broken in 2.2.14)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:39:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E163a2V-0002D4-00@mrvdom01.schlund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Springmail.105.1005596822.0.40719200@www.springmail.com> <015101c16bdc$e633dbe0$0a00a8c0@intranet.mp3s.com> <3BF07147.5050503@wanadoo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <3BF07147.5050503@wanadoo.fr>

> I am wondering too... Anyone got ideas on this ?
>
> I would like to avoid some specific problems... especially
> bugs that show up when compiling a certain module / feature
> of the kernel, like the loopback in 2.4.14.

Why not introduce a linux-2.4.xx-rc?

If there is no compile error or huge problem it will become linux-2.4.xx 
__without__ any change after 1 day.
If there is a problem, only a patch for this problem is applied. 
Just an idea

greetings

Christian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-13  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-12 20:27 Re: loop back broken in 2.2.14 joeja
2001-11-12 23:36 ` Testing Kernel Releases Before Being Released (Was Re: Re: loop back broken in 2.2.14) Sean Elble
2001-11-13  0:37   ` François Cami
2001-11-13  0:48     ` Sean Elble
2001-11-13  1:03       ` François Cami
2001-11-13  1:35         ` Matthew D. Pitts
2001-11-13  1:44           ` François Cami
2001-11-13  2:32         ` Sean Elble
2001-11-13  9:39         ` Christian Bornträger [this message]
2001-11-14  6:31 ` Re: loop back broken in 2.2.14 Michael Peddemors
2001-11-13  1:43 Testing Kernel Releases Before Being Released (Was Re: Re: loop back broken in 2.2.14) victor1 torres

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E163a2V-0002D4-00@mrvdom01.schlund.de \
    --to=linux-kernel@borntraeger.net \
    --cc=S_Elble@yahoo.com \
    --cc=jalvo@mbay.net \
    --cc=joeja@mindspring.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®