From: "Christian Bornträger" <linux-kernel@borntraeger.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, war <war@starband.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Swap vs No Swap.
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:50:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E166qVo-0001Bv-00@mrvdom03.schlund.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BFC5A9B.915B77DF@starband.net> <3BFC8D81.E25238D1@starband.net> <3BFC8DE8.7040202@zytor.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BFC8DE8.7040202@zytor.com>
> > Yeah, but when the disk starts swapping the system slows down to a halt.
> No, when the disk starts *THRASHING* the system slows down to a halt.
> If you are thrashing with swap you would be thrashing much worse without
> swap.
Not neccessarily.
Your swap early swap often paradigma works fine...as long as the swap
partition resides on an standalone harddisk without a data partition.
But imagine the situation that you have a higher band width streaming
application - e.g. viewing a video file. On the same hard disc there is a
swap partition. Cache is getting bigger and bigger until kernel starts to
swap.
Now the swapping algorithm writes on the harddisc. That troubles the hard
disc elevation mechanism, so that higher bandwidth readings starve, due to
head movements away from the data partitions towards the swap partition.
greetings
Christian Bornträger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-22 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-22 1:53 war
2001-11-22 2:23 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-11-22 2:31 ` war
2001-11-22 2:58 ` Mark Hahn
2001-11-22 4:09 ` listmail
2001-11-22 5:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-22 5:30 ` war
2001-11-22 5:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-22 9:50 ` Christian Bornträger [this message]
2001-11-22 8:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-22 11:00 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:00 ` war
2001-11-22 16:08 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-22 18:56 ` François Cami
2001-11-22 18:58 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 19:17 ` François Cami
2001-11-22 19:36 ` G . Sumner Hayes
2001-11-22 20:37 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 6:30 ` Charles Marslett
2001-11-23 9:13 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 16:46 ` Charles Marslett
2001-11-22 16:25 ` war
2001-11-22 16:37 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-11-22 17:39 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 17:56 ` war
[not found] ` <01112211150302.00690@argo>
2001-11-22 16:01 ` war
2001-11-22 16:12 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:36 ` war
2001-11-22 16:33 ` Bjorn Wesen
2001-11-22 17:37 ` Thomas S. Iversen
2001-11-22 21:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-11-22 17:41 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 17:56 ` war
2001-11-22 18:08 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 22:05 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2001-11-22 16:11 Elgar, Jeremy
2001-11-22 16:22 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-11-22 16:22 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-22 16:29 Elgar, Jeremy
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111221006010.29736-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-11-22 16:34 ` war
2001-11-26 20:18 ` Kent Borg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E166qVo-0001Bv-00@mrvdom03.schlund.de \
--to=linux-kernel@borntraeger.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=war@starband.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®