From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S273305AbRKXKVo>; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 05:21:44 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S274681AbRKXKVZ>; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 05:21:25 -0500
Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de ([195.20.224.200]:65328 "EHLO
	moutvdom01.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S273305AbRKXKVP> convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 05:21:15 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Christian =?iso-8859-1?q?Borntr=E4ger?= 
	<linux-kernel@borntraeger.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Subject: Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:20:03 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111232154320.1821-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111232154320.1821-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Message-Id: <E167ZvV-0000Cq-00@mrvdom01.schlund.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi everyone,

We have seen on the 2.4.14-loop problem that a lot of people don't read the 
LKML or the archives. 
But there is still the broken 2.4.15 on kernel.org. 

Now I am asking myself wouldn't  it be better to mark 2.4.15 as broken and 
replace it as soon as Alexander and Andrea have decided which of the patches 
is better?

greetings

Christian Bornträger