From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:35:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:15:34 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-038-097.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.38.97]:40461 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:14:50 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 19:16:42 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik), becker@scyld.com (Donald Becker), davidel@xmailserver.org (Davide Libenzi), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel Mailing List) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On December 4, 2001 07:04 pm, Alan Cox wrote: > > Single additional alloc -> twice as many allocs, two slabs, more cachelines > > dirty. This was hashed out on fsdevel, though apparently not to everyone's > > satisfaction. > > Al Viro's NFS in generic_ip saved me something like 130K of memory. Yes, all of these proposals would do that, by getting away from all inodes being the same size (basically the size of the ext2 inode). -- Daniel