From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S280984AbSADSk0>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:40:26 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S288712AbSADSkQ>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:40:16 -0500
Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:21078 "EHLO mail.inka.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S288719AbSADSkC>;
	Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:40:02 -0500
From: Bernd Eckenfels <usenet2001-12@lina.inka.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Two hdds on one channel - why so slow?
In-Reply-To: <200201041725.g04HPwSr031984@svr3.applink.net>
X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.39 (i686))
Message-Id: <E16MZG4-0001ch-00@sites.inka.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:40:00 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <200201041725.g04HPwSr031984@svr3.applink.net> you wrote:
> Why go Fibre Channel when Firewire is really starting to catch on?

Because Firewire is Consumer electronics and nearly dead. Dont now of
Enterpise Solutions with Firewire. Besides there is no switching support for
it.

I am happy to see those FC-S/ATA Controlers soon :)

Greetings
Bernd