mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: riel@surriel.com, mjc@kernel.org, bcrl@redhat.com
Subject: Re: hashed waitqueues
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 01:37:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16MeqE-0001Ea-00@starship.berlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020104094049.A10326@holomorphy.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020104094049.A10326@holomorphy.com>

On January 4, 2002 06:40 pm, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> +       unsigned long hash = (unsigned long)page;

Just to be anal here, 'long' doesn't add anything useful to this 
declaration.  In fact, u32 is what you want since you've chosen your 
multiplier with a 32 bit register in mind - on 64bit arch I think you'll get 
distinctly non-random results as it stands.

> +	hash *= GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME;
> +	hash >>= BITS_PER_LONG - zone->wait_table_bits;
> +	hash &= zone->wait_table_size - 1;

Nice hash!  For arches with expensive multiplies you might want to look 
for a near-golden ratio multiplier that has a simple contruction in terms of 
1's & 0's so it can be computed with 2 or 3 shift-adds, dumping the 
efficiency problem on the compiler.  You don't have to restrict your search 
to the neighbourhood of 32 bits, you can go a few bits less than that and 
substract from a smaller value than BITS_PER_LONG (actually, you should just 
write '32' there, since that's what you really have in mind).

--
Daniel



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-01-05  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-04 17:40 William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-04 21:47 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-04 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-04 23:21   ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-04 23:48   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-05  0:37 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-01-05  1:39   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-05  2:44     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-05  5:06       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-08 18:20         ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-08 18:27           ` William Lee Irwin III
     [not found]             ` <523d1gu1ni.fsf@love-boat.topspincom.com>
2002-01-08 18:44               ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-08 19:20           ` Hugh Dickins
2002-01-08 20:19             ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-16 14:21     ` Jamie Lokier
2002-01-16 17:42       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-18  0:34         ` Jamie Lokier
2002-01-06 21:09 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-04 21:17 Ed Tomlinson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E16MeqE-0001Ea-00@starship.berlin \
    --to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjc@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®