From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 12:53:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 12:53:22 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:24077 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 12:53:21 -0400 Subject: Re: i860 Chipset and Hyper-Threading Processors To: ciesinskna26@uww.edu (Nick Ciesinski) Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 18:12:25 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <000701c1f1f6$aa0074d0$1cde928c@UW3RYG00Y7HQGM> from "Nick Ciesinski" at May 02, 2002 11:30:25 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > patch that was delayed at that time. The user at that time was using > kernel 2.4.17, I am using kernel 2.4.18 and I am getting the message. > Was the patch ever added to the new kernel? I could not see anything It should be addressed in 2.4.19pre. > ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs > BIOS bug, IO-APIC#0 ID 2 is already used!... > ... fixing up to 4. (tell your hw vendor) > ...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 4 ... ok. The BIOS booted up with two devices having the same device ID. Thats a bit naughty but I don't think its technically a violation of the MP 1.4 spec merely very dumb 8). Linux renumbered it for you