From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:14:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:14:22 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:18961 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:14:21 -0400 Subject: Re: kill task in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 19:33:31 +0100 (BST) Cc: dal_loma@yahoo.com (Amol Lad), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200205081519.g48FJEX24062@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> from "Denis Vlasenko" at May 08, 2002 06:23:34 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state ? > > No. Everytime you see hung task in this state > you see kernel bug. Or waiting on a resource that isnt available - that can occur for example with NFS for long periods, or for a few minutes when burning a CD and the IDE bus is locked