From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 08:43:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 08:43:35 -0400 Received: from slip-202-135-75-243.ca.au.prserv.net ([202.135.75.243]:15753 "EHLO wagner.rustcorp.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 08:43:33 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Hugh Dickins Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix BUG macro In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 May 2002 12:47:31 +0100." Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:46:18 +1000 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message you w rite: > If they do make up the majority of strings, that's partly because > you don't have Andrew's out_of_line_bug work in your tree, partly > because your linker isn't combining strings (mine neither, does any?), > partly because (I suspect) you're overlooking the vast number of BUG > __FILE__ strings which are just leafnames, to each of which you're > now proposing to add one or more __FUNCTION__ strings. I don't care about the size of the kernel, I care about the fact that the compile is 5x slower than it needs to be because the contents of every pre-processed file depends on where the kernel tree happens to be (see http://ccache.samba.org) And I compile a lot of Linus kernels, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.