From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 01:37:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 01:37:02 -0400 Received: from ausmtp02.au.ibm.COM ([202.135.136.105]:8366 "EHLO ausmtp02.au.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 01:37:02 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Peter Chubb Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH, TRIVIAL] Fix argument of BLKGETSIZE64 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:02:00 +1000." <15622.54728.469214.307901@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:41:23 +1000 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <15622.54728.469214.307901@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au> you write: > > (2.5.21) The third argument to BLKGETSIZE64 is declared as u64 in > include/linux/fs.h ... > -#define BLKGETSIZE64 _IOR(0x12,114,sizeof(u64)) /* > +#define BLKGETSIZE64 _IOR(0x12,114,sizeof(uint64_t)) /* This is a wider question: uint64_t and int64_t (et. al) are ISO C requirements. Whether we should begin migration in 2.5, or leave them alone is a Linus question. > I think it should be uint64_t to allow glibc to copy and mangle the file into > its header tree. I don't think that's really an issue, is it? Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.