From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/13] minimal rmap
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:46:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17Uvge-0004Q4-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1026938562.1085.59.camel@sinai>
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 22:42, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 13:37, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > I don't agree with this, for a very simple reason.
> >
> > The current rmap patch was created in order to change the
> > VM behaviour as little as possible and ONLY provide an
> > infrastructure. Benchmarking a completely untuned thing
> > that was built to not change anything is bound to give
> > meaningless results.
> >
> > I say we _use_ the infrastructure that akpm is trying to
> > get merged now in order to implement something useful.
>
> I do agree with Rik here. Once the basic rmap infrastructure is merged
> we need to work on implementing stuff on top of it or else there is no
> point.
Well then we all agree, because that's just what I said.
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-17 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-17 5:29 Andrew Morton
2002-07-17 8:24 ` Russell King
2002-07-17 12:10 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 12:21 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 17:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-17 18:11 ` Robert Love
2002-07-17 18:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-17 20:37 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 20:42 ` Robert Love
2002-07-17 20:46 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-07-17 20:48 ` Robert Love
2002-07-17 19:31 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 19:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-17 19:41 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 19:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-17 20:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 20:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-17 20:25 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 20:25 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 20:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-17 20:39 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-17 20:50 ` Dave Jones
2002-07-17 20:53 ` Robert Love
2002-07-22 2:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-07-17 19:42 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17Uvge-0004Q4-00@starship \
--to=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®