From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: ptb@it.uc3m.es, Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
Cc: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct"
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:20:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17mIHk-0005iv-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209031544.g83FiAG03134@oboe.it.uc3m.es>
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 17:44, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> > > Scenario:
> > > I have a driver which accesses a "disk" at the block level, to which
> > > another driver on another machine is also writing. I want to have
> > > an arbitrary FS on this device which can be read from and written to
> > > from both kernels, and I want support at the block level for this idea.
> >
> > You cannot have an arbitrary fs. The two fs drivers must coordinate with
> > each other in order for your scheme to work. Just think about if the two
> > fs drivers work on the same file simultaneously and both start growing the
> > file at the same time. All hell would break lose.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rik also mentioned that objection! That's good. You both "only" see
> the same problem, so there can't be many more like it..
(intentionally misinterpreting) No indeed, there are aren't many problems
like it, in terms of sheer complexity.
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-03 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-03 15:01 Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 15:13 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-03 15:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-09-03 16:04 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 16:08 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-03 15:16 ` jbradford
2002-09-03 15:37 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-03 15:44 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 16:23 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-03 16:41 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 17:07 ` David Lang
2002-09-03 17:30 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 17:40 ` David Lang
2002-09-04 5:57 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-04 6:21 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 6:49 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-04 9:15 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 11:34 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-03 17:26 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-03 18:02 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-09-03 18:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-03 17:29 ` Jan Harkes
2002-09-03 18:31 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-03 18:20 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
[not found] <20020907164631.GA17696@marowsky-bree.de>
2002-09-07 19:59 ` [lmb@suse.de: Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" (fwd)] Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-07 21:14 ` [RFC] mount flag "direct" Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-08 9:23 ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-08 9:59 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-08 16:46 ` Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17mIHk-0005iv-00@starship \
--to=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=aia21@cantab.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®