mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>,
	"Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@it.uc3m.es>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>,
	david.lang@digitalinsight.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct"
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 00:45:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17n5Nf-0006CE-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1020904143824.7543A-100000@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk>

On Wednesday 04 September 2002 16:13, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Did you read my post which you can lookup on the below url?
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103109165717636&w=2
> 
> That explains what a single byte write to an uncached ntfs volume entails.
> (I failed to mention there that you would actually need to read the block
> first modify the one byte and then write it back but if you write
> blocksize based chunks at once the RCW falls away.
> And as someone else pointed out I failed to mention that the entire
> operation would have to keep the entire fs locked.)
> 
> If it still isn't clear let me know and I will attempt to explain again in
> simpler terms...

Anton, it's clear he understands the concept, and doesn't care because
he does not intend his application to access the data a byte at a time.

Your points are correct, just not relevant to what he wants to do.

-- 
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-05 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-03 21:48 Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 22:19 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-03 22:42   ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-03 22:52     ` Xavier Bestel
2002-09-03 23:44       ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04  7:06         ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-04  9:02           ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 11:05             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-04 11:39               ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 14:13                 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05 22:45                   ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-09-05 23:06                     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05 23:17                       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-05 23:24                         ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06  8:57                           ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06  9:08                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06  9:17                               ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06  9:50                                 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-06 14:10                                   ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 13:20                                 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-06 13:22                                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-06 13:53                                   ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 15:32                                     ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-06 14:25                       ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 17:20                         ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06 17:33                           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06 19:32                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-06 18:29                           ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-06 19:30                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-09 16:30                           ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-17 11:21                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-09-05  8:30                 ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-05  8:43                   ` David Lang
2002-09-05 14:24                   ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-05 16:59                     ` David Lang
2002-09-05 23:08                     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06  8:14                     ` Ingo Oeser
2002-09-06  9:06                     ` Helge Hafting
2002-09-04 12:49             ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-09-04 12:54               ` Peter T. Breuer
2002-09-04 13:22                 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-09-05  3:36                 ` Edgar Toernig
2002-09-05  3:58                   ` Alexander Viro
2002-09-05 15:59                     ` [RFC] intent-based lookup (was: mount flag "direct") Andreas Dilger
2002-09-03 23:24     ` (fwd) Re: [RFC] mount flag "direct" David Lang
2002-09-04  4:27   ` Kevin O'Connor
2002-09-03 23:05 ` David Lang
     [not found] <02Sep6.161154edt.62237@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
2002-09-07 13:36 ` Peter T. Breuer
     [not found] <20020909181724.GA31153@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu>
2002-09-09 18:58 ` Peter T. Breuer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E17n5Nf-0006CE-00@starship \
    --to=phillips@arcor.de \
    --cc=aia21@cantab.net \
    --cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptb@it.uc3m.es \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    --cc=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®