From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:12:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:12:50 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-022-009.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.22.9]:4773 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:12:49 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Larry McVoy Subject: Re: New BK License Problem? Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 00:18:46 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021005184153.GJ17492@marowsky-bree.de> <20021005121527.A11375@work.bitmover.com> In-Reply-To: <20021005121527.A11375@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 05 October 2002 21:15, Larry McVoy wrote: > there are people out there who oppose the BKL on grounds that they > want a completely free tool chain. Both Linus and I respect that, Linus has indeed shown respect, but you have not, quite the contrary. -- Daniel