From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:18:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:18:19 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:23346 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:18:19 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.42 In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.39 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 22:24:11 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article you wrote: > for instance, some part of EVMS design is motivated by IBM's political > desire to permit its bank customers, who have horrible old OS/2 systems, > to transparently use OS/2 volumes. Some parts? I guess it is one module. What is wrong with this. Support for non standard partition and slice types is currently cluttering up the kernel source. I will be more than happy to see this in a EVMS module. Greetings Bernd