mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious  fs.
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:34:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E184dRY-0007Mx-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DB70207.FBB38A0D@digeo.com>

On Wednesday 23 October 2002 22:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> ext3's five-second commit interval and limited journal size really
> bite in this test.  We end up doing most of the writeback within
> the measurement period rather than after it.

The test results should include *both* the time the tar completes
and the time a subsequent sync completes, to tell the whole story.

-- 
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-24  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-23 19:42 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared for various fs Steven Cole
2002-10-23 19:57 ` 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious fs Andrew Morton
2002-10-23 20:04   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-23 20:09     ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24  8:34       ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-10-23 20:05   ` Steven Cole
2002-10-23 20:32   ` Steven Cole
2002-10-23 20:44     ` 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball comparedforvarious fs Andrew Morton
2002-10-24  3:10     ` 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious fs Hans Reiser
2002-10-24  9:54       ` 2.5.44-[mm3, ac2] time to tar zxf kernel tarball compared forvarious Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-10-24 11:37         ` Padraig Brady

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E184dRY-0007Mx-00@starship \
    --to=phillips@arcor.de \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®