From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Driver Model 2 Proposal - Linux Kernel Performance v Usability
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 01:19:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E19vPrt-000057-00@calista.inka.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309052115.h85LFtXh004015@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
In article <200309052115.h85LFtXh004015@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> you wrote:
> My point is that your criteria of "total aggregate uptime" doesn't prove anything
> between diddly and squat about the actual reliability of the system.
Even if this is a not very on-topic discussion, and especially because I do
not agree about Windows beeing unstable at all:
- how about agregating the downtimes as the cummulative lost time by
instability.
Greetings
Bernd
--
eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/
Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1062637356.846.3471.camel@cube>
2003-09-04 20:14 ` James Clark
2003-09-04 20:27 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-04 21:16 ` James Clark
2003-09-04 21:50 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-04 22:10 ` insecure
2003-09-04 22:01 ` jdow
2003-09-04 20:29 ` Rik van Riel
2003-09-04 21:12 ` James Clark
2003-09-04 21:40 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-04 21:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-09-04 22:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-04 21:29 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-09-04 21:51 ` James Clark
2003-09-04 22:06 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-04 22:10 ` Martin Mares
2003-09-04 22:23 ` Gustav Petersson
2003-09-05 17:52 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-05 18:31 ` James Clark
2003-09-05 18:59 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-09-05 19:12 ` Dale P. Smith
2003-09-05 19:45 ` Stan Bubrouski
2003-09-05 19:59 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-09-05 20:01 ` James Clark
2003-09-05 20:08 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-05 21:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-05 23:19 ` Bernd Eckenfels [this message]
2003-09-10 20:50 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-10 20:48 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-09-10 23:22 ` James Clark
2003-09-10 23:58 ` Greg KH
2003-09-12 20:51 ` Timothy Miller
2003-09-12 20:55 ` Tim Hockin
2003-09-15 11:39 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-09-05 20:53 Chad Kitching
2003-09-05 23:30 ` Mike Fedyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-04 22:41 Chad Kitching
2003-09-03 17:53 James Clark
2003-09-03 17:49 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-09-03 18:23 ` Guillaume Morin
2003-09-04 4:10 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-09-03 18:35 ` Guillaume Morin
2003-09-03 19:30 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-09-03 18:18 ` Greg KH
2003-09-03 18:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-09-03 18:49 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 18:58 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-09-03 20:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E19vPrt-000057-00@calista.inka.de \
--to=ecki@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®