From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262605AbUEOOam (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 10:30:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262625AbUEOOam (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 10:30:42 -0400 Received: from mail0-105.ewetel.de ([212.6.122.105]:19886 "EHLO mail0.ewetel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262605AbUEOOal (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 May 2004 10:30:41 -0400 To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS & long symlinks = stack overflow In-Reply-To: <1W7S5-3Am-13@gated-at.bofh.it> References: <1W7yE-3lZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <1W7S5-3Am-13@gated-at.bofh.it> Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 16:30:28 +0200 Message-Id: From: Pascal Schmidt X-CheckCompat: OK Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 15 May 2004 16:00:21 +0200, you wrote in linux.kernel: > Lovely. The real limit imposed by client (apparently not enforced, though) > is PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 4 - 1. What are the protocol limits? None. An NFSv3 server can enforce an arbitrary limit on filename length, advertised via PATHCONF, though. -- Ciao, Pascal