From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261766AbVASQKf (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:10:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261768AbVASQKf (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:10:35 -0500 Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.41]:31386 "EHLO mail-in-01.arcor-online.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261766AbVASQKb (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:10:31 -0500 From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> Subject: Re: kbuild: Implicit dependence on the C compiler To: Sam Ravnborg , Sam Ravnborg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" Reply-To: 7eggert@gmx.de Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:09:03 +0100 References: User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sam Ravnborg wrote: > 1) Unconditionally execute make install assuming vmlinux is up-to-date. > make modules_install run unconditionally, so this is already know > practice (o) Vote for this. IMO, a make install should NEVER run the compiler. The reason is: I'm deliberaely compiling as a user on the fastest system before I copy or mount the FS to/on some other box and do a make install. The other box will be _very_ slow while compiling or missing some of the needed components (e.g. gcc).