mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org>"  <7eggert@gmx.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] sound/oss/rme96xx.c: fix two check after use
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:40:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1DLfIV-0000pl-Fa@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3SGA8-4n3-9@gated-at.bofh.it>

Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:17:42AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

>> This patch fixes two check after use found by the Coverity checker.
> 
> Bullshit.  ->private_data is set by rme96xx_open() to guaranteed non-NULL
> and never changed elsewhere.  Same comment about reading the fscking
> source, BUG_ON(), etc.

If there are checks, they should be there for a purpose, and any sane
reader will asume these checks to be nescensary. If they are dead code, you
can say that, but please don't flame Adrian for fixing obviously buggy code
in a way that is sane and at least more correct than the original without
using several days of his lifetime to analyze the whole driver. Instead, you
could provide the correct fix.
-- 
Funny quotes:
33. If lawyers are disbarred and clergymen defrocked, doesn't it follow that
    electricians can be delighted, musicians denoted, cowboys deranged, models
    deposed, tree surgeons debarked, and dry cleaners depressed?

       reply	other threads:[~2005-04-13 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3SGgN-41r-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <3SGA8-4n3-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-04-13 10:40   ` Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org> [this message]
2005-04-13 14:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-04-13 17:46     ` Al Viro
2005-04-13  2:17 Adrian Bunk
2005-04-13  3:03 ` Al Viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-27 21:17 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1DLfIV-0000pl-Fa@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org \
    --to=7eggert@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®