From: Olaf Titz <olaf@bigred.inka.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Exploit in 2.6 kernels
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 00:00:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1DToOl-0005iV-00@bigred.inka.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425E6627.9080405@aitel.hist.no>
> I have the impression that 2D is fine with ATI cards, even those
> that doesn't have open 3D drivers. And even a really old low-end
> card performs fine for 2D work. Even the unaccelerated
> framebuffer drivers seems to have enough performance
> for 2D in most cases. The cpu is fast these days. :-)
Not quite. The _perceived_ difference e.g. between unaccelerated fbdev
and mga driver is dramatic when you scroll around much in your windows
(of eclipse, mozilla...) even on 3 GHz CPUs. (I know very well since I
had to live with fbdev on a G550 for some time...)
And for video acceleration, there's always the point where it makes
the difference between stuttering and no stuttering.
I won't use any non-accelerated basic X11 and non-accelerated Xv any
more, no matter how fast the CPUs get. (The fact that it was always
worse n years ago for bigger n doesn't count...)
Olaf
PS. The most important feature of any graphics card for me? No fan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-05 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-12 9:34 John M Collins
2005-04-12 12:24 ` Baruch Even
2005-04-12 15:00 ` John M Collins
2005-04-12 21:08 ` Chris Wright
2005-04-12 21:32 ` John M Collins
2005-04-13 5:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-04-13 9:47 ` Helge Hafting
2005-04-13 12:59 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-04-13 13:06 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-04-13 13:23 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-04-13 14:01 ` John M Collins
2005-04-16 2:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-13 15:22 ` Chris Friesen
2005-04-14 14:01 ` Helge Hafting
2005-04-20 18:17 ` nVidia stuff again Doug Ledford
2005-04-20 23:12 ` Dave Airlie
2005-04-21 11:23 ` Helge Hafting
2005-04-21 12:15 ` Doug Ledford
2005-04-21 12:54 ` Dave Airlie
2005-04-21 13:35 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-04-21 14:43 ` Manu Abraham
2005-04-21 21:17 ` J.A. Magallon
2005-04-22 14:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-15 15:00 ` Exploit in 2.6 kernels Alan Cox
2005-04-15 16:06 ` Dave Airlie
2005-04-15 16:19 ` Duncan Sands
2005-04-14 12:46 ` Helge Hafting
2005-05-05 22:00 ` Olaf Titz [this message]
2005-04-13 13:02 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-04-13 14:26 ` Eric Rannaud
2005-04-13 14:41 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-04-14 20:02 ` Greg Folkert
2005-04-14 22:27 ` John M Collins
2005-05-09 18:37 ` Alessandro Salvatori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1DToOl-0005iV-00@bigred.inka.de \
--to=olaf@bigred.inka.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome