From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261304AbVFDJPw (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2005 05:15:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261310AbVFDJPw (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2005 05:15:52 -0400 Received: from c64.shuttle.de ([194.95.226.64]:51075 "EHLO c64.shuttle.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261304AbVFDJPq (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2005 05:15:46 -0400 X-Virus-Check: ClamAV 0.85.1/911 on c64.shuttle.de; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 11:15:45 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:15:45 +0200 From: Frank Elsner To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.11: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:247! In-Reply-To: <20050603163356.5e7fc472.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050603163356.5e7fc472.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:33:56 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > Frank Elsner wrote: > > > > Jun 3 04:04:54 seymour kernel: kernel BUG at fs/jbd/checkpoint.c:247! > > We're hoping that this is fixed now. How repeatable is it for you? I fear I can't reproduce it. It occured for the first time since I'm runnning linux-2.6.11. I'm now using linux-2.6.11.11. > Please test > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/linux-2.6.12-rc5.tar.bz2 > plus > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.12-rc5-git8.bz2 Thanks for dealing with the problem and the hint(s). I don't understand the current numbering scheme. Is linux-2.6.12-rcX better than linux-2.6.11.xx? Linux-2.6.12-rcX is 3 days older than linux-2.6.11.11! Shall I go to linux-2.6.12-rcX or stay with linux-2.6.11.11? --Frank