From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751010AbVIJOyA@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751010AbVIJOyA (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:54:00 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751014AbVIJOyA
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:54:00 -0400
Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:1154 "EHLO mail.inka.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbVIJOx7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:53:59 -0400
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6-GIT] NTFS: Release 2.1.24.
Organization: Private Site running Debian GNU/Linux
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0509101424260.20200@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel
User-Agent: tin/1.7.8-20050315 ("Scalpay") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.8.1 (i686))
Message-Id: <E1EE6jn-0004ru-00@calista.inka.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:53:51 +0200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <Pine.LNX.4.60.0509101424260.20200@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> you wrote:
> I do not see what is wrong with that.  It behaves exactly like I would 
> expect it to.  Maybe I have strange expectations?  (-;

Well, the others bahave differently, so we need to fix all others.

Greetings
Bernd