mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Rigg <lk@sound-man.co.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rc3-rt10 crashes on boot
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 20:16:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ENxhr-0001CH-12@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

On Friday, October 7 Steve Rostedt wrote:

>Add this patch and it will add the option for you in x86_64 (I forgot that
>you were using that).  I even set it to be default on. I didn't add a test
>in do_IRQ, but I believe that the tests in latency.c should be good
>enough.

Hi Steve,

Thanks for the patch. I applied it to 2.6.14-rc3-rt12, looked in
arch/x86_64/Kconfig.debug just to be sure it applied OK to -rt12,
then ran make. It failed to compile, with the following message:

  CC      kernel/rt.o
  CC      kernel/latency.o
kernel/latency.c: In function '__print_worst_stack':
kernel/latency.c:336: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'long unsigned int'
kernel/latency.c:384:3: error: #error Poke the author of above asm code line !
kernel/latency.c: In function 'debug_stackoverflow':
kernel/latency.c:386: error: 'STACK_WARN' undeclared (first use in this function)
kernel/latency.c:386: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kernel/latency.c:386: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [kernel/latency.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error 2

I wonder if DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW was left out of x86_64 for this reason.

John

             reply	other threads:[~2005-10-07 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-07 19:16 John Rigg [this message]
     [not found] <E1EOe3U-00018A-Fy@localhost.localdomain>
2005-10-11 11:17 ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-09 16:30 John Rigg
2005-10-09 16:28 John Rigg
     [not found] <E1ENxei-0001C9-F7@localhost.localdomain>
2005-10-07 19:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-11 10:55   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-10-07 15:11 John Rigg
2005-10-07 15:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-07  0:37 John Rigg
2005-10-07  6:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-07 11:43   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1ENxhr-0001CH-12@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=lk@sound-man.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®