From: Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@7eggert.dyndns.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
vojtech@suse.cz, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable the most annoying printk in the kernel
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:18:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1EVcYE-00016V-Dg@be1.lrz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52JuY-6s7-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> wrote:
> Well, keyboard detected and reported an error. Kernel reacted with
> printk(). You are removing that printk(). I can understand that,
> printk is really annoying, but I really believe _some_ error handling
> should be added there if you remove the printk.
I once posted a printk that would only actually print if the last printk
wasn't the same message. This would ensure error reporting while preventing
dmesg from being spammed. Off cause this would fail if two subsystems are
competing to annoy you.
--
Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF
verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-28 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <52bjf-680-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <52Hj9-3e6-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <52HCr-3CO-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <52JkU-6gS-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <52JuY-6s7-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-28 22:18 ` Bodo Eggert [this message]
2005-10-27 8:26 Andi Kleen
2005-10-27 14:04 ` Keenan Pepper
2005-10-27 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-10-27 22:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-10-27 18:03 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-27 23:23 ` jerome lacoste
2005-10-28 7:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-28 18:43 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-28 18:52 ` Andre Eisenbach
2005-10-28 18:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-10-28 20:43 ` Lee Revell
2005-10-28 20:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-28 20:59 ` Russell King
2005-10-28 21:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-10-28 21:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-28 21:40 ` Russell King
2005-10-28 22:41 ` Jon Masters
2005-10-28 21:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-28 21:36 ` Russell King
2005-10-29 15:40 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-29 7:45 ` Pavel Machek
2005-10-29 15:36 ` Ingo Oeser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1EVcYE-00016V-Dg@be1.lrz \
--to=harvested.in.lkml@7eggert.dyndns.org \
--cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®