From: be-news06@lina.inka.de (Bernd Eckenfels)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:14:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1FHWCm-0002rT-00@calista.inka.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060310002121.GJ27280@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> wrote:
> Your hash sizes are still ridiculously large.
How long are those entries in the buckets kept? I mean if I untar a tree the
files are only locked while extracted, afterwards they are owner-less... (I
must admint I dont understand ocfs2 very deeply, but maybe explaining why so
many active locks need to be cached might help to find an optimized way.
> By the way, an interesting thing happened when I recently switched disk
> arrays - the fluctuations in untar times disappeared. The new array is much
> nicer, while the old one was basically Just A Bunch Of Disks. Also, sync
> times dropped dramatically.
Writeback Cache?
Gruss
Bernd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-10 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-03 22:27 Ocfs2 performance bugs of doom Daniel Phillips
2006-03-04 0:53 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-04 3:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-04 7:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-05 19:22 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-06 1:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-06 2:58 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Mark Fasheh
2006-03-06 4:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-06 19:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-07 3:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-07 4:58 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-07 6:56 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2006-03-09 6:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-09 7:26 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 7:43 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-09 4:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-09 12:30 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-10 5:14 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-10 0:21 ` [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance Mark Fasheh
2006-03-10 1:14 ` Bernd Eckenfels [this message]
2006-03-10 7:10 ` Joel Becker
2006-03-11 1:09 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-03-11 1:57 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-03-10 11:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 18:23 ` Zach Brown
2006-03-10 21:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 21:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-03-10 2:33 ` [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance bugs of doom J. Bruce Fields
2006-03-10 10:27 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1FHWCm-0002rT-00@calista.inka.de \
--to=be-news06@lina.inka.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®