From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750761AbWDQKp4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:45:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750757AbWDQKp4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:45:56 -0400 Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.48]:10633 "EHLO mail-in-08.arcor-online.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750748AbWDQKpz (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:45:55 -0400 From: Bodo Eggert Subject: Re: want to randomly drop packets based on percent To: George Nychis , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: 7eggert@gmx.de Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:45:29 +0200 References: <62wv1-U5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Message-Id: X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner-Information: See www.mailscanner.info for information X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner-From: harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org George Nychis wrote: > But then I ran into the problem of properly seeding the random number > generator... srand(time(0)) is one way... however time() returns > seconds, therefore i would drop multiple packets in a single second if I > used this method which is very undesirable. What is the proper way to > generate a random number here? You seed the random generator once, not each time you use it. -- Ich danke GMX dafür, die Verwendung meiner Adressen mittels per SPF verbreiteten Lügen zu sabotieren.