From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755305AbXGCMyh (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:54:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753256AbXGCMya (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:54:30 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:57162 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752913AbXGCMy3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jul 2007 08:54:29 -0400 From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> Subject: Re: shouldn't LVM support be selected by default? To: "Robert P. J. Day" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Reply-To: 7eggert@gmx.de Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:54:21 +0200 References: <8CNXF-47r-3@gated-at.bofh.it> User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Message-Id: X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner-Information: See www.mailscanner.info for information X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-be10.7eggert.dyndns.org-MailScanner-From: 7eggert@gmx.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19AU1MEhIONMcxVHn7bl+i8FvnF3kFI7e7Hppz jV5La6SLVPJQ+xMDDcNtura8gA0nOjS3F+J8zWQPrJjRxnYv+C 5y1B2pkYPf3QV+p8p+WFg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Robert P. J. Day wrote: > just built a new kernel and didn't notice that support for LVM > wasn't selected by default for x86. given what i thought was fairly > widespread use of LVM2, wouldn't it make sense to have this option as > part of the default config? If you don't know about LVM, you don't need it. Do you? -- It's redundant! It's redundant! Friß, Spammer: er0q@Cqd.7eggert.dyndns.org rfgnH@Ubk.Gv.7eggert.dyndns.org Vmvwh@trxjBn.7eggert.dyndns.org sMezxCpya7@ro.7eggert.dyndns.org