From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, gregkh@suse.de
Subject: [PATCH 7/11] x86, UV: correct BAU discovery of hubs and sockets
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:22:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1OJvNy-0004aW-9S@eag09.americas.sgi.com> (raw)
Correct the initialization-time assumption of contigous blade numbers and
of sockets numbered from zero.
There may be hubs present with no cpu's enabled.
There may be disabled sockets such that the active socket is not
number zero.
And assign a 'socket master' by assuming that a socket is a node. (it is
not safe to extract socket number from an apicid)
Diffed against 2.6.34 -tip
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: 100531.linux-tip/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
===================================================================
--- 100531.linux-tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
+++ 100531.linux-tip/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
@@ -1547,11 +1547,13 @@ calculate_destination_timeout(void)
*/
static void uv_init_per_cpu(int nuvhubs)
{
- int i, j, k;
+ int i;
int cpu;
int pnode;
int uvhub;
short socket = 0;
+ unsigned short socket_mask;
+ unsigned int uvhub_mask;
struct bau_control *bcp;
struct uvhub_desc *bdp;
struct socket_desc *sdp;
@@ -1562,7 +1564,7 @@ static void uv_init_per_cpu(int nuvhubs)
short cpu_number[16];
};
struct uvhub_desc {
- short num_sockets;
+ unsigned short socket_mask;
short num_cpus;
short uvhub;
short pnode;
@@ -1581,43 +1583,54 @@ static void uv_init_per_cpu(int nuvhubs)
spin_lock_init(&bcp->masks_lock);
pnode = uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->pnode;
uvhub = uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->numa_blade_id;
+ uvhub_mask |= (1 << uvhub);
bdp = &uvhub_descs[uvhub];
bdp->num_cpus++;
bdp->uvhub = uvhub;
bdp->pnode = pnode;
- /* kludge: assume uv_hub.h is constant */
- socket = (cpu_physical_id(cpu)>>5)&1;
- if (socket >= bdp->num_sockets)
- bdp->num_sockets = socket+1;
+ /* kludge: 'assuming' one node per socket, and assuming that
+ disabling a socket just leaves a gap in node numbers */
+ socket = (cpu_to_node(cpu) & 1);;
+ bdp->socket_mask |= (1 << socket);
sdp = &bdp->socket[socket];
sdp->cpu_number[sdp->num_cpus] = cpu;
sdp->num_cpus++;
}
- socket = 0;
- for_each_possible_blade(uvhub) {
+ uvhub = 0;
+ while (uvhub_mask) {
+ if (!(uvhub_mask & 1))
+ goto nexthub;
bdp = &uvhub_descs[uvhub];
- for (i = 0; i < bdp->num_sockets; i++) {
- sdp = &bdp->socket[i];
- for (j = 0; j < sdp->num_cpus; j++) {
- cpu = sdp->cpu_number[j];
+ socket_mask = bdp->socket_mask;
+ socket = 0;
+ while (socket_mask) {
+ if (!(socket_mask & 1))
+ goto nextsocket;
+ sdp = &bdp->socket[socket];
+ for (i = 0; i < sdp->num_cpus; i++) {
+ cpu = sdp->cpu_number[i];
bcp = &per_cpu(bau_control, cpu);
bcp->cpu = cpu;
- if (j == 0) {
+ if (i == 0) {
smaster = bcp;
- if (i == 0)
+ if (socket == 0)
hmaster = bcp;
}
bcp->cpus_in_uvhub = bdp->num_cpus;
bcp->cpus_in_socket = sdp->num_cpus;
bcp->socket_master = smaster;
+ bcp->uvhub = bdp->uvhub;
bcp->uvhub_master = hmaster;
- for (k = 0; k < DEST_Q_SIZE; k++)
- bcp->socket_acknowledge_count[k] = 0;
- bcp->uvhub_cpu =
- uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->blade_processor_id;
+ bcp->uvhub_cpu = uv_cpu_hub_info(cpu)->
+ blade_processor_id;
}
+nextsocket:
socket++;
+ socket_mask = (socket_mask >> 1);
}
+nexthub:
+ uvhub++;
+ uvhub_mask = (uvhub_mask >> 1);
}
kfree(uvhub_descs);
for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-02 21:22 Cliff Wickman [this message]
2010-06-08 20:58 ` [tip:x86/uv] x86, UV: Correct " tip-bot for Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1OJvNy-0004aW-9S@eag09.americas.sgi.com \
--to=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®