mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ashok.raj@intel.com, shaohua.li@intel.com,
	anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com
Subject: intel-iommu.c bug
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:03:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1PTbq3-00083L-Sp@eag09.americas.sgi.com> (raw)



This bug was reported by Mike Habeck <habeck@sgi.com>.
The test system was an SGI Altix UV.  These are Mike's words:

 It appears there is a bug in the iommu code that when 'forcedac' isn't used
 the nvidia driver is handed back a 44bit dma address even though it's
 dma_mask is set to 40bits.
 
 I added some debug to the intel_iommu code and I see:
  intel_map_sg(): dma_addr_t=0xf81fffff000, pdev->dma_mask=0xffffffffff
 
 Note the dma_addr_t being handed back is 44bits even though the mask is 40bits.  
 This results in the nvidia card generating a bad dma (i.e. the nvidia hw is
 only capable of generating a 40bit dma address so the upper 4 bits are lost
 and that results in the iommu hw detecting a bad dma access):
 
   DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
   DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [36:00.0] fault addr 81fffff000 
   DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
 
 If I boot with 'forcedac' then the dma mask is honored and the dma_addr_t
 handed back is 40bits:
 
   intel_map_sg(): dma_addr_t=0xfffffff000, pdev->dma_mask=0xffffffffff
 
 Without forcedac you'd expect these early maps being handed back to be 32bits.  
 This is the first debug printf (so the first mapping the nvidia device has
 requested) so I'd expect it to be 0xfffff000... interesting that is what the
 lower 32bits are in this address being handed back... that 0xf81 upper bits 
 appear to be garbage bits.  This might be a hint to help find the bug...
 

             reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-17 15:03 Cliff Wickman [this message]
2010-12-17 18:11 ` Raj, Ashok
2010-12-17 18:28   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-12-17 18:45     ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1PTbq3-00083L-Sp@eag09.americas.sgi.com \
    --to=cpw@sgi.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®