Re: [UML] 3.16 build without optimization fails

[Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 1418 bytes --]

Yes, it's still there.

Am 19.08.2014 22:26 schrieb Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>:
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> wrote: 
> > Hi. 
> > 
> > Thanks for your answer. 
> > 
> > There goes my plan to better understand an UML kernel lock up by using a debugger... Everything gets optimised out with -O2 :-( 
>
> Is it the filesystem/block lockup you saw some time ago? 
> Maybe Thorsten can give more details. 
> He sent me an patch off list a few days ago. 
>
> > Can you give an example function that relies on this GCC feature? 
> > 
> > With kind regards 
> > Thomas 
> > 
> > Am 19.08.2014 22:06 schrieb Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu: 
> >> 
> >> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:12:10 +0200, Thomas Meyer said: 
> >> > > Hi, 
> >> > > 
> >> > > the build with -O0 fails with: 
> >> 
> >> > > bug or feature? 
> >> > > 
> >> > > any ideas? 
> >> 
> >> Feature.  The kernel is *known* to not build with -O0, because that 
> >> disables *all* function inlining, and there's several functions that *have* 
> >> to be inlined in order to function properly (most notably, anything 
> >> that uses the gcc __builtin_return_address in a function that is expected 
> >> to be inlined). 
>
>
>
> -- 
> Thanks, 
> //richard 
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥