From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932442AbbCQUr0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:47:26 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:51110 "EHLO mail.inka.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932090AbbCQUrZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:47:25 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1117 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:47:24 EDT Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:28:40 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v13] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86) References: <1426612922-3308-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20150317173035.GI23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20150317175750.GB4141@cloud> <20150317180824.GK23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1338809369.22714.1426618883816.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Organization: private Linux site, southern Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT From: Olaf Titz Message-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I am tempted to leave the "flags" argument in place though, along > with the "MEMBARRIER_QUERY" flag. Thoughts ? http://lwn.net/Articles/585415/