From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away" to the regulator tree
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:30:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ZCXdz-0001VY-VY@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433923073-907-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
The patch
regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away
has been applied to the regulator tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 5ad2cb14f5b8f3cb3d8688115037751b1ff45455 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:06:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes
right away
Perhaps this is just personal preference, but ...
This patch introduces a new local variable to receive and test regulator
initialisation data. It simplifies and cleans up the code making it
that little bit easier to read and maintain. The local value is assigned
to the structure attribute when all the others are. This is the way we
usually do things.
Prevents this kind of nonsense:
this->is->just.silly = fetch_silly_value(&pointer);
if (!this->is->just.silly) {
printk("Silly value failed: %d\n", this->is->just.silly);
return this->is->just.silly;
}
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
index d5cb267fa192..cb482089050b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
@@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ static int pwm_regulator_init_continuous(struct platform_device *pdev,
static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ const struct regulator_init_data *init_data;
struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata;
struct regulator_dev *regulator;
struct regulator_config config = { };
@@ -240,14 +241,15 @@ static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
- config.init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(&pdev->dev, np,
- &pwm_regulator_desc);
- if (!config.init_data)
+ init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(&pdev->dev, np,
+ &pwm_regulator_desc);
+ if (!init_data)
return -ENOMEM;
config.of_node = np;
config.dev = &pdev->dev;
config.driver_data = drvdata;
+ config.init_data = init_data;
drvdata->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pwm)) {
--
2.1.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-10 7:57 [REBASED 0/5] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode Lee Jones
2015-06-10 7:57 ` [REBASED 1/5] ARM: STi: STiH407: Add PWM Regulator node Lee Jones
2015-06-10 7:57 ` [REBASED 2/5] regulator: pwm-regulator: Separate voltage-table initialisation Lee Jones
2015-06-10 9:02 ` Lothar Waßmann
2015-06-10 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2015-06-10 9:15 ` [REBASED v1.1 " Lee Jones
2015-06-10 7:57 ` [REBASED 3/5] regulator: pwm-regulator: Add support for continuous-voltage Lee Jones
2015-06-10 7:57 ` [REBASED 4/5] dt: regulator: pwm-regulator: Re-write bindings Lee Jones
2015-06-10 7:57 ` [REBASED 5/5] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away Lee Jones
2015-07-07 18:30 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1ZCXdz-0001VY-VY@debutante \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®