From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: Uninline kcalloc
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:10:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E307A48D-2146-4052-8A84-E7FA690A6703@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1202151324060.28225@router.home>
On Feb 15, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Any allocation larger than MAX_ORDER << PAGE_SHIFT will fail since the
> page allocator cannot serve larger contigous pages.
Yes, any number larger than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE would do the trick.
The question is whether people would like to adopt
kmalloc(ARRAY_BYTES(n, size), ...);
or
knalloc(n, size, ...);
Besides, I am worried that ARRAY_BYTES is error-prone because you
have to make sure that ARRAY_BYTES is used only in *alloc, not
elsewhere, not in forms like ARRAY_BYTES(n, size) + padding_size,
etc. If ARRAY_BYTES is mostly used with kmalloc(), and the only
safe form is kmalloc(ARRAY_BYTES(n, size), ...), then adding a new
allocator knalloc(n, size, ...) seems like a simpler choice.
BTW, here goes a partial list of places where the new allocator
could be used to simplify existing checks.
fs/cifs/cifsacl.c:912
if (num_aces > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct cifs_ace *))
return;
ppace = kmalloc(num_aces * sizeof(struct cifs_ace *),
GFP_KERNEL);
fs/cifs/asn1.c:428
if (size < 2 || size > UINT_MAX/sizeof(unsigned long))
return 0;
*oid = kmalloc(size * sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_ATOMIC);
fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c:308
if (n > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*args->devs)) {
status = htonl(NFS4ERR_BADXDR);
goto out;
}
args->devs = kmalloc(n * sizeof(*args->devs), GFP_KERNEL);
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c:447
if (size < 2 || size > ULONG_MAX/sizeof(unsigned long))
return 0;
*oid = kmalloc(size * sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_ATOMIC);
drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_fops.c:673
insns =
kcalloc(insnlist.n_insns, sizeof(struct comedi_insn), GFP_KERNEL);
I believe there are more places without those checks, where the new
allocator can offer better security.
- xi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 14:11 integer overflows in kernel/relay.c Dan Carpenter
2012-02-08 8:34 ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-08 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-09 12:41 ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-09 17:39 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-09 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC] slab: introduce knalloc/kxnalloc Xi Wang
2012-02-09 13:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-02-09 13:19 ` Jens Axboe
2012-02-09 13:26 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-09 13:48 ` [PATCH RFC v2] slab: introduce kmalloc_array Xi Wang
2012-02-09 22:42 ` David Rientjes
2012-02-09 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-09 22:47 ` Jesper Juhl
2012-02-09 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-09 23:43 ` Joe Perches
2012-02-13 15:08 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-13 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-13 19:44 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-02-13 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-14 7:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-02-14 7:35 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-02-14 11:12 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-14 15:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-14 16:30 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-14 16:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-14 16:43 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-14 19:33 ` Uninline kcalloc Christoph Lameter
2012-02-14 19:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-14 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-14 20:50 ` Nick Bowler
2012-02-14 21:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-15 20:17 ` Nick Bowler
2012-02-15 20:24 ` Nick Bowler
2012-02-14 20:45 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-14 20:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-02-14 21:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-14 21:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-02-14 21:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-14 21:46 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-14 22:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-15 19:14 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-15 19:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-16 3:10 ` Xi Wang [this message]
2012-02-16 14:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-16 18:32 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-16 20:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-02-10 13:09 ` [PATCH RFC v2] slab: introduce kmalloc_array Alexey Dobriyan
2012-02-10 13:11 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-02-10 13:55 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-10 13:58 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-02-10 14:09 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-11 12:19 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-02-12 5:46 ` Xi Wang
2012-02-09 12:56 ` integer overflows in kernel/relay.c Pekka Enberg
2012-02-09 10:44 ` [patch] relay: prevent integer overflow in relay_open() Dan Carpenter
2012-02-09 11:55 ` walter harms
2012-02-09 12:36 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E307A48D-2146-4052-8A84-E7FA690A6703@gmail.com \
--to=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®