From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.mainlining.org (mail.mainlining.org [5.75.144.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264C8360ED6 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2026 10:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.75.144.95 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788691229; cv=none; b=KoedBZZeTcHCjryMxxAaU3D7Sg2jXYIdIPceYDMVznbpY4aI1dm4f8mO7rQfDuTNxAV32UE+iykN3eZfDYk6Nb2qLWoS97U54lK1dHJyGJJcWGrel8OzeDn+gv25VcOuGGeW+hKAw6bKxTVNIfFqevqdOIjXHyFAfXZdJyK83+E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788691229; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rk/sBuv+0+faRbBGjnRZy+cZVoPVw6YSNswMxs7QOow=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Mpbt5G++scNfWGIt+XFJn+Wu6fBRF7rlufRjlgxwuFFdXzPJwYndaEnhP7QIt1eeufTwji84uoY22JzDmXYdBrbz25dyx5+/X0007EFDMbJr1ZgXPUV780scgmtTa3vm10Wo2fayG/+OabNjWGJT7CR6NswccWaHj8DAgEhm1hk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mainlining.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mainlining.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b=GtuZ2nB4; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b=FOTphNSj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.75.144.95 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mainlining.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mainlining.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b="GtuZ2nB4"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=mainlining.org header.i=@mainlining.org header.b="FOTphNSj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=202507r; d=mainlining.org; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; t=1788691217; bh=M/Re7kwgmEbnkuoA6Aagg6L 0d3A9QNtAbvKVTy4BiaM=; b=GtuZ2nB4KtLa647ZadMmqoRJCy8ZpOGv68BUX4WnQBWTtWKdiy xiuqP/v+n+1dkGKjCCiwjDrWeF0ayav6UK87BwS8WndXyUtq4pgSDgyh+wnAXnmCFdD8Psyzkoo gVQY/OMWbwABLmX4x8GawCqfBoJoDb43k0KSP2mFVBS5hYR97USUXVmSrVwo6Z3a37s+mU5esda Rio5E+5b8qn2KiI+KOQxks0VFlp9KJkZYrP3XfW9IRivM3VEXnqF7XAMlz1RnMdGIn7XToX4lOh O2nK1SEu31reMjTzFgsHOTxe3W6P5Z2274EsiVrRzIifF95LbQBpMlNivzNrGTP1DYw==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; s=202507e; d=mainlining.org; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; t=1788691217; bh=M/Re7kwgmEbnkuoA6Aagg6L 0d3A9QNtAbvKVTy4BiaM=; b=FOTphNSjnxRyW++w64Li194Dv4tBhfgPOvfRwC80i5Ji2wFey5 y5RjVb7MrLa/+y5/43mT8EOXYu9du2B2t5Ag==; Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 11:40:15 +0100 From: Bradley Morgan To: Thomas Gleixner , liushugao@xiaomi.com CC: frederic@kernel.org, isaacmanjarres@google.com, lingyue@xiaomi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, weipengliang@xiaomi.com, wengjinfei@xiaomi.com, xiongliang@xiaomi.com, zhangjiawei8@xiaomi.com, zhukaiqian@xiaomi.com, Daniel Lezcano Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=3A_=5BExternal_Ma?= =?UTF-8?Q?il=5D=5BPATCH=5D_tick/broa?= =?UTF-8?Q?dcast=3A_Plug_clockevents_replacement_race?= In-Reply-To: <8733vn47e7.ffs@fw13> References: <20361A3E-0D14-4CC5-946E-D75244CB4A45@mainlining.org> <87h5k34cob.ffs@fw13> <4FDB69E5-7DEE-43CE-A66A-23A2D8DC987C@mainlining.org> <87bjab4avu.ffs@fw13> <347CE2FE-3675-44AA-80D4-1CF8632C8C9D@mainlining.org> <8733vn47e7.ffs@fw13> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 6 September 2026 00:15:28 BST, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >On Sat, Sep 05 2026 at 23:06, Bradley Morgan wrote: >> On 5 September 2026 23:00:05 BST, Thomas Gleixner >> wrote: >>>On Sat, Sep 05 2026 at 22:24, Bradley Morgan wrote: >>>> On 5 September 2026 22:21:24 BST, Thomas Gleixner >>>wrote: >>>>>On Thu, Sep 03 2026 at 16:12, Bradley Morgan wrote: >>>>>> Hi, I have a pixel 7, if I could be asked to backport this, then >I'll >>>be >>>>>> happy to, for the fix, add: >>>>>> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bradley Morgan >>>>> >>>>>It would be helpful to respond to the actual patch and not to some >>>>>arbitrary reply. That way you might avoid your tags to be overseen by >>>>>tools. >>>>> >>>> Sorry my mail client sometimes glitches, >>> >>>I fail to see how your mail client is responsible for you to hit reply >>>on the wrong mail. >>> >>>But what do I know about all these new fangled mail clients who decide >>>on their own what to do. When this happens to me I'm 100% confident that >>>_I_ got it wrong and not my mail client. Maybe I'm just too old-school. >>> >> Remove Daniel too. Bounces. > >Sorry no. That's not how this works > > #1 An OOO response is purely informational and does not justify to > remove the recipient from the CC list just because > > #2 A bouncing email address is of course a valid reason to remove > someone from CC, but it is a matter of courtesy in the context of > the Linux kernel lists to lookup whether the person vansished from > the planet or just changed the mail address. That's what the > MAINTAINERS file is for. > > The thread you responded to was from TWO years ago... > >Aside of that you did not respond to my actual complaint about >responding to a random reply instead of responding to the actual patch. > >If you fail to review what the AI agent of your choice hallucinates >then so be it, but don't be surprised that I'm going to put you on my >ignore list as a consequence and recommend to all other maintainers to >do so as well. > > Thomas > > > oh crap, I see it now. I thought it was a recent thread cause of my lore search! Probably: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87qzj74dxi.ffs@fw13/ ? --- Thanks! https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/