From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:52:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:52:22 -0400 Received: from f175.law14.hotmail.com ([64.4.21.175]:16147 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:52:02 -0400 X-Originating-IP: [194.236.106.153] From: "John Nilsson" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Some experience of linux on a Laptop Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:51:56 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2001 20:51:56.0627 (UTC) FILETIME=[817DEA30:01C0FCEF] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Well I thought that it was time for me to give some feedback to the linux community. So I will tell you guys a little of my experience with linux so far. I have a Toshiba Portégé 3010CT laptop. That is: 266MHz Pentium-MMX 4GB HD with 512kb cache (which linux reduces to 0kb) 32 Mb EDO RAM After have tried Slackware Gentoo Linux From Scratch Debian Mandrake and soon ROCK linux I have come to the conclusion that linux is NOT suitable for the general desktop market, I have configured a number of linux routers/fierwalls and am really pleased with the scalability, but the harware compatibility is to damn low for a general user base. I know this isn't really a Linux issue rather a distribution issue, but in the end it's you guys that make the drivers. So a little plea is that you let the optimization phase cooldown a little and concern your self a little more with compatibility, and ease of installation, (tidy up the kernel build system). On my particular computer the chipset (toshiba specific) is not supported wich makes the harddrive unable to run in UDMA and/or use it's cache. Somehow this make X totaly unusable. With a little luck if it doesn't hang it takes several minutes to launch a simple program. This could be X specific, but I doub't it. So when you speak of being able to run on 386:es I still have problem starting X on 266MHz with 32Mb mem. This should not be =) And regarding my slow HD, could anyone implment an option to mount a filesystem while keeping statistics on fileusage so that one could optimize physical-file-placement? Features I would like in the kernel: 1: Make the whole insmod-rmmod tingie a kernel internal so they could be trigged before rootmount. 2: Compile time optimization options in Make menuconfig 3: Lilo/grub config in make menuconfig 4: make bzImage && make modules && make modules install && cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/'uname -r' something inside make menuconfig 5: Better support for toshiba computers... well try =) 6: Wouldn't it be easier for svgalib/framebuffer/GGI/X11 and others if the graphiccard drivers where kernel modules? 7: As I said mount with statistics database of files. 8: A way to change kernel without rebooting. I have no diskdrive or cddrive in my laptop so I often do drastic things when I install a new distribution. I'm not on the list so please CC me any responses /John Nilsson _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.