From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:47:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:47:55 -0500 Received: from f231.law8.hotmail.com ([216.33.241.231]:19471 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:47:53 -0500 X-Originating-IP: [24.44.249.150] From: "sean darcy" To: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.54 ide-scsi and cdrecord Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 15:56:23 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2003 20:56:24.0057 (UTC) FILETIME=[E8387E90:01C2B4FC] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org That did It! [root@amd1900 root]# cdrecord -scanbus -dev=/dev/hdc Cdrecord 2.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 J?rg Schilling scsidev: '/dev/hdc' devname: '/dev/hdc' scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2 Warning: Open by 'devname' is unintentional and not supported. Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27 Using libscg version 'schily-0.7' scsibus0: 0,0,0 0) 'SONY ' 'CD-RW CRX195E1 ' 'ZYS5' Removable CD-ROM 0,1,0 1) * 0,2,0 2) * 0,3,0 3) * 0,4,0 4) * 0,5,0 5) * 0,6,0 6) * 0,7,0 7) * But look what happens if I use ATAPI:x,y,z ( tried all the combinations - same result): [root@amd1900 root]# cdrecord -scanbus -dev=ATAPI:1,0,0 Cdrecord 2.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 J?rg Schilling scsidev: 'ATAPI:1,0,0' devname: 'ATAPI' scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 Warning: Using ATA Packet interface. Warning: The related libscg interface code is in pre alpha. Warning: There may be fatal problems. Using libscg version 'schily-0.7' scsibus0: 0,0,0 0) 'ADAPTEC ' 'ACB-5500 ' 'FAKE' NON CCS Disk 0,1,0 1) * 0,2,0 2) * 0,3,0 3) * 0,4,0 4) * 0,5,0 5) * 0,6,0 6) * 0,7,0 7) * FWIW, this is what the new xcdroast shows. Just never knew I had an Adaptec cdrw!! BTW, is there a patch to fix ide-scsi yet? thanks >From: Jens Axboe >To: sean darcy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: 2.5.54 ide-scsi and cdrecord >Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 16:37:28 +0100 > >On Sat, Jan 04 2003, sean darcy wrote: > > What am I missing? I thought we didn't need the scsi layer anymore. > >cdrecord -dev=/dev/hdX > >-- >Jens Axboe _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail