From: Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>
To: norbert@doyensec.com
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nstree: check listing permission before taking a namespace reference
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 12:52:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F8EF9799-CDCE-435F-97E2-13B6CC92EC6D@mainlining.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34C54FF6-AA8F-4124-9B40-C68EADB26D99@doyensec.com>
On 4 September 2026 15:28:05 BST, Norbert Szetei <norbert@doyensec.com>
wrote:
>legitimize_ns() takes a reference on the candidate namespace before
>may_list_ns() has decided whether the caller may see it. The
>__free(ns_put) cleanup on the denied path can drop the last reference to a
>mount namespace while we still hold the rcu read lock, and put_mnt_ns()
>may sleep there. This is the same problem commit 2ec2aff3c8e2 ("ns: make
>sure reference are dropped outside of rcu lock") fixed for the put_user()
>path. Neither ns_requested() nor may_list_ns() needs a reference, both
>only look at the namespace type and at the caller's own namespaces, so do
>the checks first and take the reference last.
>
Great catch!
>Fixes: 76b6f5dfb3fd ("nstree: add listns()")
>Signed-off-by: Norbert Szetei <norbert@doyensec.com>
>---
>A reproducer is available on request.
Please? Or a splat, or anything?
>
> kernel/nstree.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/nstree.c b/kernel/nstree.c
>index 6d12e5900ac0..831f279d174a 100644
>--- a/kernel/nstree.c
>+++ b/kernel/nstree.c
>@@ -533,19 +533,13 @@ DEFINE_FREE(ns_put, struct ns_common *, if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) ns_put(_T))
> static inline struct ns_common *__must_check legitimize_ns(const struct
> klistns *kls,
> struct ns_common *candidate)
> {
>- struct ns_common *ns __free(ns_put) = NULL;
>-
> if (!ns_requested(kls, candidate))
> return NULL;
>
>- ns = ns_get_unless_inactive(candidate);
>- if (!ns)
>- return NULL;
>-
>- if (!may_list_ns(kls, ns))
>+ if (!may_list_ns(kls, candidate))
> return NULL;
>
>- return no_free_ptr(ns);
>+ return ns_get_unless_inactive(candidate);
> }
Fix LGTM,
+ CC akpm, he tends to look at fixes in kernel/, if brauner wants to merge this then that's ok :)
>
> static ssize_t do_listns_userns(struct klistns *kls)
>
--- Thanks!
https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@grrlz.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-06 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 14:28 Norbert Szetei
2026-09-06 11:52 ` Bradley Morgan [this message]
2026-09-06 11:52 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-06 18:25 ` Norbert Szetei
2026-09-06 18:26 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-09-09 8:04 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F8EF9799-CDCE-435F-97E2-13B6CC92EC6D@mainlining.org \
--to=brads@mainlining.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=norbert@doyensec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®