From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751983AbbJEAlV (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2015 20:41:21 -0400 Received: from ftcsun4.grain-media.com ([59.124.182.211]:39173 "EHLO ftcsun4.faraday.com.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751848AbbJEAlT (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Oct 2015 20:41:19 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 882 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 20:41:17 EDT From: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?Sm9obiBGZW5nLUhzaW4gQ2hpYW5nKMuw3Oj96Sk=?= To: Felipe Balbi , Peter Senna Tschudin CC: Yuan-Hsin Chen , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , "mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com" , "ralf@linux-mips.org" , "alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com" , "ramneek.mehresh@freescale.com" , Laurent Pinchart , "abrestic@chromium.org" , "sboyd@codeaurora.org" , "Rafa? Mi?ecki" , "haokexin@gmail.com" , "pebolle@tiscali.nl" , Sergei Shtylyov , Masanari Iida , Randy Dunlap , "chris@rorvick.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] usb-host: Remove fusbh200 driver Thread-Topic: [PATCH] usb-host: Remove fusbh200 driver Thread-Index: AQHQ/TlUIgH7o8pO80GD9GX0wO3wKJ5aSHrXgAHESaA= Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 00:25:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1442847678-7970-1-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> <1443784707-9611-1-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> <20151002173955.GZ5552@saruman.tx.rr.com> <877fn3fy1z.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <877fn3fy1z.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com> Accept-Language: zh-TW, en-US Content-Language: zh-TW X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.64.9] x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MAIL: mse.faraday-tech.com t950PsMe096324 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id t950g0nX004346 Hi Balbi, >> John Feng-Hsin Chiang, can you confirm that from your side the >> fusbh200 driver can be deleted? >... but let's get this confirmation. Yes, you can delete fusbh200. Best Regards, John Chiang -----Original Message----- From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@ti.com] Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2015 5:21 AM To: Peter Senna Tschudin Cc: John Feng-Hsin Chiang(˰); Yuan-Hsin Chen; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Alan Stern; mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com; ralf@linux-mips.org; alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com; ramneek.mehresh@freescale.com; Laurent Pinchart; abrestic@chromium.org; sboyd@codeaurora.org; Rafa Miecki; haokexin@gmail.com; pebolle@tiscali.nl; Sergei Shtylyov; Masanari Iida; Randy Dunlap; chris@rorvick.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-host: Remove fusbh200 driver Peter Senna Tschudin writes: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 01:18:27PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: >>> fusbh200 and fotg210 are very similar. The initial idea was to >>> consolidate both drivers but I'm afraid fusbh200 is not being used. >>> >>> This patch remove the fusbh200 source code, update Kconfig and two >>> Makefiles. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin >> >> after all this work on these previous patches, you just remove fusbh200 ? >> >> that's a bit odd. Are you sure there are no users for this driver ? >> It has been in tree since 2013. > I don't know about users, but I could not find devices using fusbh200. > The closest I got was: > > http://www.ebay.fr/itm/Digital-Video-Langzeit-Recorder-H264-DVR-3G-4-K > anal-/370525106495 > > But it only says: Main Processor: Faraday. I don't know which usb host > controller it uses. > > The idea of deleting fusbh200 came from contacting the driver authors. > I was asking where to find hw for testing, and I was told that the > fusbh200 driver can be deleted. Also at least Fedora and Ubuntu build > modules for these host controllers by default. If fusbh200 and fotg210 > are only available integrated into SOCs, maybe building the modules by > default for x86 is not a good idea. But if there are users I'll be > happy to continue the integration work, even better if I find hardware > for testing. fair enough, if can be deleted it's fine... > John Feng-Hsin Chiang, can you confirm that from your side the > fusbh200 driver can be deleted? ... but let's get this confirmation. > For the patches I sent, 10 of 14 are for fotg210 which I'll fix and resend. cool, thanks -- balbi {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I